【案例研讨】亚太地区经典PSC案例六（下篇）

我们致力于提供专业、准确的港口国监督检查信息发布、信息查询、技术咨询等帮助与指导。微信公共平台账号：cn_psc，亲们也可以扫扫我们的二维码加关注哦！

总结 SUMMARY 

缺陷1)

对于该缺陷，港口国监督检查官和港口国当局就相关SOLAS公约和IMO通函的所做的理解是主观的。这个案例中，船舶建造年月应当被考虑在内。

缺陷2)

类似于缺陷1，港口国监督检查官和港口国当局的理解看上去是主观的。鉴于该船的建造年月，引用的SOLAS公约和导则不适用于所讨论的船舶。此外，如果救生圈的数量、类型和位置与安全计划相一致的话，就不应开出这个缺陷。若港口国监督检查官对该类要求有怀疑，可以联系船旗国主管机关或RO。

缺陷3)

尽管对标示有'H'标志的舱盖是否应被视为一个专用直升机甲板或非专用直升机甲板有不同的看法，但是如果消防员装备数量和位置都与防火控制图相符合，一般来说则不应开出缺陷。如果港口国监督检查官就此有疑问，他可以要求船旗国主管机关或RO进行澄清和确认。引用行业组织的指导书(即这个案例中的ICS)作为缺陷的依据是不合适的。

Deficiency 1)

The interpretation of the relevant SOLAS regulation and IMO circular by the PSC officer/port State Authority regarding the deficiency appeared subjective. Year of built of the ship should be considered in this case.

Deficiency 2)

Similar to deficiency 1), the explanation by the PSC officer/port State Authority seemed subjective. Both the SOLAS regulation and the guidelines referred to are considered not applicable for the vessel in question based on year of built. Furthermore, if the number, type and location of lifebuoys are found in consistent with the safety plan, the deficiency should not be recorded. In case the PSC officer has doubt regarding the carriage requirement, flag State/RO may be consulted.

Deficiency 3)

Although there would be different views on whether a hatch cover with “H” marking should be considered as an on-purpose helideck or a non-purpose helideck, if quantity and location of fire fighter’s outfits are in line with the fire control plan, no deficiency should be recorded generally.Should the PSC officer have doubt thereon, he may request clarification and confirmation fromthe flag State/RO. It would not be appropriate to make reference to the guide book by industry

organization (i.e. ICS for this case.) for a deficiency.

如果想知道更多国际海事前沿资讯，请持续关注“China PSC”，也可点击“PSC资讯”菜单获取更多热点信息。我们将持续为您提供专业、准确的港口国监督检查信息发布、信息查询、技术咨询等帮助与指导。