［19］［22］Thornton，P.H.，etal.TheInstitutionalLogicsInstitutionalism［C］.London：SagePublicationsLtd，2008.
Perspective：ANewApproachtoCulture，Structure，andProcess［26］Thornton，P.TheRiseoftheCorporationinaCraft
［M］.Oxford：OxfordUniversityPress，2012.51，55—56.Industry：Conflictandconformityininstitutionallogics［J］.Academy
［20］Giddens，A.TheConstitutionofSociety［M］.Cambridge：ofManagementJournal，2002，（1）.
PolityPress，1984.［27］Thornton，P.MarketsfromCulture：InstitutionalLogics
［21］王富伟，阎凤桥.独立学院组织种群的制度起源［J］.华andOrganizationalDecisionsinHigherEducationPublishing［M］.
东师范大学学报（教育科学版），2018，（6）.Stanford，CA：StanfordUniversityPress，2004.
［23］Trow，M.ManagerialismandtheAcademicProfession［A］.［28］李弘祺.学以为己：传统中国的教育［M］.上海：华东教
MichaelBurrage.Twentieth-CenturyHigherEducation：Eliteto育出版社，2017.2—9.
MasstoUniversal［C］.Baltimore：JohnsHopkinsUniversityPress，［29］亚里士多德.尼各马可伦理学［M］.北京：商务印书馆，
2000.271—298.2003.xxi—xxiii.
［24］王富伟.迈向行动的教育质性研究［J］.北京教育教学［30］教育部师范教育司.教师专业化的理论与实践（修订
研究，2019，（3）版）［M］.北京：人民教育出版社，2003.16—17.
［25］Thornton，P.&Ocasio，W.InstitutionalLogics［A］.［31］唐德斌.高校辅导员职业倦怠的表现及成因分析［J］.
Greenwood，R.etal.TheSAGEHandbookofOrganizational教育与职业，2013，（2）.
AParadoxoftheDouble-TrackPromotionforUniversityCounselors
——AStudyBasedontheGroundedTheory
ChenXiangming&WangFuwei
Abstract：Tomakethejobofuniversitycounselorsmoreattractive，theMinistryofEducationofthePRCissuedthe
double-trackpromotionpolicy；accordingtothepolicy，universitycounselorscanapplyforbothadministrativepositions
andacademicpositionsintheirpromotion.Thisstudy，basedonthegroundedtheory，exploreshowuniversitycounselors
copewiththeirpromotionaccordingtothispolicy.Theresultsrevealthatinnamethepolicyoffersopportunitiesfor
double-trackpromotion，butitisincompatiblewiththejobofuniversitycounselors，andactuallyputsthemintrouble.In
spiteoftheirstrategiesunderdifferentconditionsandinterventions，noneofthemissatisfiedwiththeresultsoftheir
promotionsothatthewell-intendedpolityhasproducedunexpectedconsequences：adivorcebetweennameand
substanceintheobjective，meansandresults.Thisparadox，whichresultsfromthemisplacedadministrative，
professionalandmarketlogic，hasnotonlybroughtconfusionstouniversitycounselorsintheirprofessionalidentity，but
alsoposedachallengefortheirprofessionalism.Forthosehighereducationinstitutionspracticingsimilarpoliciestocome
outontopinacademiccompetitions，thesefindingscanbeusedforreference.
Keywords：universitycounselor；groundedtheory；paradox；divorcebetweennameandsubstance；institutional
logic
Authors：ChenXiangming，professoroftheGraduateSchoolofEducation，PekingUniversity，anddistinguished
visitingresearcheroftheShanghaiMunicipalInstituteforLifelongEducation，EastChinaNormalUniversity（Beijing
100087）；WangFuwei，associateresearcheroftheResearchCenterforMoralEducation，BeijingAcademyofEducational
Sciences（Beijing100036）
［责任编辑：刘洁］
—96— |
|
