|
注：全新剑桥雅思18已正式发布！Shark 已经完成了所有题目的详细解析和高分范文，将会在【雅思月计划】课程中为大家逐步上线和练习。已经做完题目的同学，可点此链接获得剑18文字版详细解析！ 今日写作考题 Task1: Table（动态图：8个国家的国际游客在2009和2010年的到达量） Task2: Some people think that as housing is a basic need for people, governments should provide free housing for everyone who can't afford it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?（重复2023年1月11日考题） 题目分析 今天这个题目是非常常规的政府和社会类话题，其实在很多国家，都会给特定的市民提供低价或者免费的“保障性住房”。比如在我所居住的成都市，就经常在房子的外墙上见到这样的标志，其实它代表的意义是公租房、经济适用房、限价房等保障性住房。 本道题目并不难，但需要注意的是题目的意思是：政府的责任是给每个负担不起住房的人提供免费住房，所以这道题是一个含有绝对词题目。题目是否含有绝对词，写起来是完全不同的，我们在【写作冲刺计划】的第5天会专门学习，这里就不细讲了。Introduction: I tend to disgree with this statament because providing free housing to everyone who cannot afford it may be impractical.Body-1（让步段）: Benefits of free housing provision:- Governments should provide free housing to ensure basic living conditions for all citizens. Extensive social housing programs can be implemented to provide affordable housing options. This could contribute to reducing homelessness and income disparities, thus improving social equality.Body-2: It is still not feasible for the government to offer free housing to all citizens in need.- Fiscal limitations often pose significant challenges for governments. For instance, In many developing nations, where government revenues are constrained and competing priorities, like education and healthcare, do exist, providing free housing for all who need it would strain already stretched budgets.- Completely free housing without any form of contribution or responsibility from beneficiaries can lead to unintended consequences. It may discourage individuals from seeking employment or pursuing personal growth, perpetuating a cycle of dependency. A more sustainable approach would involve targeted assistance that empowers individuals to contribute to their housing costs based on their financial capabilities.In conclusion, while the provision of free housing by governments is a noble objective, it is not pragmatic due to fiscal realities and other undesired effects.
|
